Analysis of Professional Development Plan Essay

The definition of paid festering varies in drill zones and educators fit in that the landmark is ever changing and involves the engage of engineering. Some educators ca-ca said that the term has an operational definition. In the article, key construct factors in durable instructional technology nonrecreational suppuration, author John act up offers the fol low-pitcheding definition for educators within the scope of the technological ageProfessional incrementgoes beyond the term breeding with its implications of nurture skills, and treates a definition that includes formal and sexual means of helping teachers not totally learn new skills, but as well as develop new insights into pedagogy and their have practices, and explore new or move understandings of content and resources. This definition of sea captain developing includes support for teachers as they encounter the challenges that come with putting into practice their evolving understanding around the use of technology to support inquiry-based learning (p.2).Professional victimisation may encompass various characteristics much(prenominal) as goals and outcomes align to the orders, relevant topics in trainings, opportunities for staff collaboration, reading maintained by an on-site coordinator, spunky quality and professional training and evaluations to sic tellingness of weapons platform.James Polk, author of traits of effective teachers, states, the need for a strong professional growing political computer program is well complete in research (p.2). Mr. Polk (2006) cites a fresh study of factors contributing to three aspects of the tenet process that, teachers ranked professional training in the top third of magnificence on each aspect (p. 2).In analyzing the professional study plan of my school district, Richland County work District ace, I find several issues that were determine by Mr. Polk. Mr. Polk defined several jobs associated with the traditional i n-service programs that atomic number 18 deemed ineffective. Mr. Polk (2006) states thatassumptions, such as periodic in-service being qualified to develop new teaching methods and repair practice, teachers being able to learn by listening to a speaker, and professional development being a luxurysooner than an integral part of district forward motion, are all negating factors in the implementation of patronization of training programs (p. 2).Mr. Polk further identifies research-based, more effective assumptions such as professional development should be perpetual, and school adjustment involves external and interior organizations and personal development. In professional development programs, the instructions to teacher should be exhibit or modeled, practiced with feedback and professional development should be integrated into the daily bearing of teachers. Mr. Polk (2006) states that if professional growth rests solely on bimonthly, two-hour in-service sessions later the pupils are fired early, hence any training received leave alone unlikely be reflected in student mastery (p.2).Richland County School District unitarys (RSDI) professional development program has several fates such as the formulate Do train Act (PDCA), incarnation, and schoolroom walkthrough.According to the Richland County School District Ones website, Plan Do Check Act is used in traffic patterning curriculum and delivering schoolroom instruction, in providing student support services, staff goal put and evaluation, developing any new program, carrefour or process design, planning strategically and starting a new improvement project or implementing any change. The Plan parcel is identifying the learning problem and assemblage the needed data. The Do component is analyzing the causes and implementing the plan on a psychometric test of pilot basis. The Check component of PDCA is gathering the data results of the solution and analyzing the data. The Act component is implementing the instruction for all students and modifying the improvement plan. avatar is the districts professional development management system that allows for teaches to sign up for trainings offered by the district. All the trainings are offered after school or in the summertime this contradicts the recommendation offered by Mr. Polk that professional development should be integrated into the daily keep of the teacher during the school day.The classroom walkthrough team up is a district employee, the principal, assistant principal, and the professional development on-site coordinator. The team conducts the classroom walkthrough by observing the instructional strategies of a teacher for a total of cinque to ten minutes. The teacher is not offered previous information or feedback on the classroom walkthrough to correct or enhance his instructional strategies. The Richland County School District One website offers the levels of date of the students who the team should ident ify during the walkthrough. The levels Authentic Engagement, religious rite Engagement, Passive Compliance, Retreatism, and Rebellion and their definitions are cited on the web page but teachers would not know their level due to want of communication from the classroom walkthrough team.The problem of the myopic quality of professional development was identified in the South Carolina schools that I have researched. For example, in Richland County School District devil, the districts professional development program mirrors Richland County School District Ones program by only focussing on providing monthly in-service trainings on half-days for students or summer in-service activities. Both districts also ply the occasional monthly state or national conference in the teachers subject area and online training, i.e. educational Television. Richland County School District 2 differs by offering their Richland School District Twos Technology Education collaborationism Mentors Program . The program is for school-selected representatives from every school in the district. The program focuses on helping spouse staff members develop personal technology skills and integrate technology into their classroom. Besides this program, I was unable to find any divagation from the two districts and the professional development training.Richland County School District One and District Two professional development programs consist of low quality training once a month, irrelevant topics, wishing of feedback from teachers and administrators, and concepts but lack of implementation. The districts programs lack the scope, high quality, accessibility (besides the Avatar system in RSDI), relevancy, and feedback from students. The majority of the districts professional development program is the poor quality program set forth by Mr. Polk two-hourin-service sessions after the students are dismissed early from school.ReferencePolk, J. (2006). Traits of effective teachers. liberal ar ts Education Policy Review, 107, p. 23-30.Wells, J. (2007). Key design factors in durable instructional technology professional development. Journal of Technology and teacher Education, 15, p. 101-123.www.richlandone.org/ipda/Training_Tools/pdca.htm and www.richland2.org